(no subject)
Aug. 8th, 2016 08:55 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This comes from a facebook discussion I had this weekend.
As some of you might know, cursive is becoming a dying art. It has been, for the last decade or more, optional to teach it in schools. Most elementary school teachers are not comfortable teaching it to children because they lack the skills themselves.
I'm an archivist, which means that I NEED to know how to read cursive for my job. Historians also must learn it. However, I have never been a fan of it and am overall quite pleased that it's dying out. Arguments in support of it have been the following:
It teaches children to be patient, it teaches children coordination and proper penmanship, and it is faster once you are proficient. However, I think it's safe to assume that the person who argued in favor of it hasn't taught children penmanship before. I have, to 6 year olds who are first learning how to write. Just teaching penmanship and writing in general accomplishes all of this. When I taught kids how to write, some of them (usually the girls) were more talented and accomplished with their writing. The young boys tended to be more impatient and sloppy. It was important to teach the boys that they needed to learn to take their time and learn the letters properly.
As for the quicker part, yeah that's probably true, however is that really a good thing? Once you write faster and faster, your writing becomes more and more illegible. This is the biggest problem I have with cursive. It is a pain in the ass to read! Especially when someone was writing naturally. Short hand simply does NOT have that same problem. Even if someone is a sloppy writer, their writing is generally comprehensible, especially if they know someone else needs to read their handwriting. I can't say the same with cursive.
Some people are disappointed that it's becoming quickly archaic, but I don't anticipate it ever making a comeback.
[Poll #2051437]
As some of you might know, cursive is becoming a dying art. It has been, for the last decade or more, optional to teach it in schools. Most elementary school teachers are not comfortable teaching it to children because they lack the skills themselves.
I'm an archivist, which means that I NEED to know how to read cursive for my job. Historians also must learn it. However, I have never been a fan of it and am overall quite pleased that it's dying out. Arguments in support of it have been the following:
It teaches children to be patient, it teaches children coordination and proper penmanship, and it is faster once you are proficient. However, I think it's safe to assume that the person who argued in favor of it hasn't taught children penmanship before. I have, to 6 year olds who are first learning how to write. Just teaching penmanship and writing in general accomplishes all of this. When I taught kids how to write, some of them (usually the girls) were more talented and accomplished with their writing. The young boys tended to be more impatient and sloppy. It was important to teach the boys that they needed to learn to take their time and learn the letters properly.
As for the quicker part, yeah that's probably true, however is that really a good thing? Once you write faster and faster, your writing becomes more and more illegible. This is the biggest problem I have with cursive. It is a pain in the ass to read! Especially when someone was writing naturally. Short hand simply does NOT have that same problem. Even if someone is a sloppy writer, their writing is generally comprehensible, especially if they know someone else needs to read their handwriting. I can't say the same with cursive.
Some people are disappointed that it's becoming quickly archaic, but I don't anticipate it ever making a comeback.
[Poll #2051437]
no subject
Date: 2016-08-08 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-08 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-08 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-08 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-08 10:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-09 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-09 01:45 am (UTC)Plus, reading it? Especially when people start using short hand and abbreviations for things? That's hard enough to read in print, but when someone has a note that goes LONNC and writes that in cursive, yeah.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-09 02:39 pm (UTC)I *HATED* my cursive exercises in my youth, but that's because my hands shake slightly. Thus, my handwriting has always looked ugly, no matter how much I practiced. I would practice my cursive script for an hour or more each day, getting horrific hand cramps in the process... and would see absolutely no improvement despite my efforts.
So: I have always hated the act of writing cursive script, and thus I am biased against it. That being said, I will be the first to admit that these days schoolchildren are not encouraged to practice artistic expression anywhere near as much as they did when I was in school... and I consider truly fine cursive script to be a form of art. So while my personal experience with it was very bad, I still would say that it should still be taught in school, at least at a most basic level.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-10 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-18 06:51 pm (UTC)I like that Emma can read it because well, her grandparents write their cards in cursive so they should at least be able to read it...but she never uses it.